Why continuous improvement requires more than just technical input if real, sustainable change is to be achieved

Share this page:

Why continuous improvement requires more than just technical input if real, sustainable change is to be achieved

Monday, March 27th, 2017


For over 30 years the global manufacturing sector has focussed resources on improving quality, service and reduced unit cost through the introduction of lean, 6 sigma and other operational excellence strategies. The reasons for this are simple; ‘globalisation’ has meant that cost and product differentiation has never been more important.

In our experience change is a fundamental fact of business life but relatively few managers and leaders are equipped successfully to implement and sustain change, and for a few there is an inherent incapability at mission critical leadership and managerial levels. Continuous Improvement, we argue, relies on more than just implementing lean techniques, and work practices such as multiskilling and line side inventory. It requires effective team working and for “discretionary behaviours” to be demonstrated by everybody in the business. This being achieved through empowerment, team working and engagement. Moreover, these behaviours cannot be achieved through lean workshops and training alone, nor by utilising ‘off the shelf’ training or through glossy employee communications. The challenge, therefore, is to achieve a horizontal alignment of operational and people strategies that is sustainable and cost effective.

A typical scenario

Organisations go through cycles where they review operations to ensure capabilities match current best practice, fit into the commercial strategy of the business and are fit for customer demands. These cycles often take place after economic shocks have hit a business, be it a sudden drop in profits from lost clients or a macroeconomic event such as a recession or ‘Brexit’. All too often change initiatives such as continuous improvement (CI) and lean follow modest upturns as resources become available to tackle issues and the appetite for change is at its highest.

Typically, resources are allocated to Continuous Improvement teams for them to review and update processes such as 5S, 7 wastes, lean sigma and so on and these will appear successful as the, “low hanging fruit” is harvested in terms of quick fixes and ‘cost downs’.

However, this improvement initially, hailed as a success and rightly championed as best practice, is often transitory and unsustained.


Simply put: people, people and people!

Many operational and leadership teams unreasonably feel that CI is designed adversely to affect their jobs and careers. They fear change and, in many cases, fail to continue engaging with CI when it becomes more challenging and the quick gains are gone. This lack of engagement is typically not because employee communications or incentive schemes are missing. More likely it will be because various layers, individuals or departmental teams are reluctant to change beyond a certain, very modest point. Only relatively rarely do we find that the staff is actually incapable of changing.

Our Experience

Ramsey Hall and The Occupational Psychology Group (The OPG) has worked extensively with industrial, life sciences, FMCG and technology sector clients over a 25+ year period and thus have a deep understanding of how CI is often derailed and corrupted. Our analysis of major client projects in the last few years has identified several common denominators:

I.       The capability of supervisors, managers and leaders is unquantified and ‘assumed’. Performance management is often sadly lacking, incomplete or ineffectively implemented which means no real measure of past performance or future capability is available. More often than not, capability is assessed on a ‘gut feel’ or familiarity level with no real measures or benchmarks being available around “what looks good” in the industry.


II.       Managers and leaders have traditionally been promoted or appointed on the failed ‘craft skills’ model where success at operational or technical level has led to promotion with little or no regard to leadership and strategic management capability. All too often the result unfortunately is a case of ‘the blind leading the blind’ leading to disengagement; a failed command & control culture which results in poor performance; a lack of ‘discretionary behaviours’, and poor or even non-existent team working.


III.       Training and performance management has often been lacking especially at first line management, operational management and mid/senior levels. Traditional learning & development has tended to focus on senior leadership without much resources being allocated further down. In our experience, the ‘drip down’ approach to leadership has limited efficacy as the ability of leaders to influence beyond immediate reports is often very limited.


IV.       HR, operations and business functions can often lack horizontal alignment and therefore take little or no regard of the wider needs of the business. We argue CI teams MUST work with HR if goals are to be achieved.



What does this mean?

In assessing over 400 managers across multiple sectors, we found several troubling ‘common themes’ which appear to transcend industry type or organisational size.


a.   Managers often lack the ‘change management’ capability to sustain CI. In some cases this includes poor cognitive ability as well as a negative attitude towards implementing practical change management techniques on a people level.


b.   An entrenched set of ‘norms’ where the emphasis has become too dependent on ‘fire fighting’. The overriding need to meet operational objectives and schedules means that managers ignore, dismiss as a “nicety” or fail to prioritise improvement. We have seen this rational used to justify ignoring urgent and fundamental issues such as excessive waste and product scrap, which clearly costs a lot of money!


c.   In many cases a more insidious reason for failure exists; it’s called, “a will to do better”.  With one major multinational client, in particular, the gap analysis of the business wide cohort found that poor work attitudes, low motivation and old fashioned, “them and us” attitudes prevailed. This meant that the managers concerned were never going to be successful with CI and therefore, when we ran a 9-box grid workshop, we recommended action was taken to deal with the manager!


d.   CI training, 6 sigma blackbelts etc. are critical to effective CI but so too is a holistic approach to behavioural change, leadership capability and the pursuit of the holy grail of HR: “discretionary behaviours”. Traditional employee engagement fails to address capability assessment & development and does little to identify barriers to change.



Our approach

We work with Continuous Improvement and HR teams to understand current capabilities, assess attainment and potential, and identify gaps and barriers to change at individual, team, functional and organisational levels. These may then be benchmarked against our substantial ‘best practice’ data set or other external data sources such as CEB/SHL.

To achieve this, we have a plethora of techniques and methodologies at our disposal. However no two organisations are the same so we cannot be specific in recommending an approach until we understand the client in more detail.

Typically, depending on the client culture, participant numbers, demographics (global or UK centric) and budget, yes budget, we utilise a number of methodologies including:


1.   Designing competency/career frameworks aligned with CI, operational excellence and business strategy. This may then be used as part of the assessment

2.   Capability development centres – useful for larger cohorts

3.   Psychometric assessment with depth interviews – a more individual approach

4.   360 surveys with assessment and interviews

5.   Benchmarking with external comparators (our database is extensive and we have access to other norms)

6.   Using interview data gathered around attitudes and experience of lean etc. gathered by your CI team or our consultants


We then design and get the individual participant to “buy in” to their personal development plan and produce a gap analysis with Learning & Development plans at the organisational level. This also produces further evidence to support performance management, succession planning and restructuring. Often, we chair workshops for 9 box grid modelling using all the data that the organisation has at its disposal.

And afterwards

We help sustain performance through the provision of psychometric assessment at recruitment stage, and the design of online attraction and selection methodologies. After all, as we have seen above, effective recruitment is more cost effective than selecting the wrong hire

Moreover, we also work with our clients to design and implement performance reviews which work and which are linked to competencies. We also offer executive coaching and development to help those with potential to reach the right level.

All this can become part of your workforce strategy and which we can input as required.


Matthew Davis

Matthew Davis

Director Talent, Leadership & OD Consulting, Ramsey Hall & The Occupational Psychology Group (OPG)

1 comment

White Paper: Succession Planning

Friday, February 7th, 2014

Succession Planning

The new year has seen the economy recover ever so slightly, with a great deal written about the need for organisations to nurture their talent, keep their people motivated and utilised to their full potential.

This white paper looks at how more and more organisations are generating competitive advantage through succession planning.

Succession Planning white paper button

Aerospace and Defence, A Looming Crisis Of Skills?

Tuesday, November 12th, 2013

Aerospace and Defence White Paper A Looming Crisis Of Skills?

Welcome to the latest white paper from Ramsey Hall.

This is the latest white paper in the ‘Perspectives on Organisational Effectiveness’ series.

This white paper contrasts the activities of enlightened organisations that have tried to engage with, attract, and nurture talent against those that have had fewer processes and practices in place in the Aerospace and Defence Industry.

The paper also looks at the implications for skills and workforce practices in response to anticipated demand for 29,000 new civil aircraft before 2031. For example, EADS has recently upgraded its forecast by 3.7% and the civil airliner market is estimated to be worth £2.7 trillion as the global fleet is replaced and expanded.

This is a market further enhanced by demand for new technologies, financially more efficient aircraft, and environmentally friendly products.  The sector is huge for the UK given it has a 17% market share, but it may also be problematic if organisations fail to respond to the demands of the changing market; fail to engage with potential aerospace leaders, and fail to develop technical specialists for the future.

As with all our white papers we welcome feedback and discussion, and please feel free to share this on your LinkedIn, Google+ or Twitter by using the buttons below.

What is Happening to Human Resources in the Aerospace and Defence Industry Download Ramsey Hall's Latest White Paper To Find Out


Beyond the Tick Box – Board Composition and Effectiveness

Monday, June 10th, 2013

Welcome to the latest white paper from Ramsey Hall.

This latest white paper in the ‘Perspectives on Organisational Effectiveness’ series takes a critical review and analysis of board composition and effectiveness for listed and non listed UK organisations.

Our role as consultants takes us into many organisations, public and private sector; large and small. This latest paper builds on our board room experience, as well as academic research undertaken by our consultants, to give you an overview of how we believe boards can perform to their optimum.

As with all our white papers we welcome feedback and discussion. Please feel free to engage with us via social media or through the email address below.

Executive Summary

Organisational success depends on the development and translation of strategy into results and the effective control of the business, which we call governance. This paper looks at why organisations of all sizes must ensure their board functions at its optimum if the organisation is to succeed in today’s competitive global economy. We look at the drivers of change, the stark realities of current board practices and the reality organisations experience when implementing the Davies Review, The UK Corporate Governance Code and IOD guidelines for unlisted companies.

To view our latest white paper, please click here

Why Companies are Failing to Maximise Their Most Important Asset

Thursday, April 12th, 2012

High Performance Working: White paper

High Performance Working White Paper

With much research showing the benefits of High Performance Working (HPW) to ‘bottom line’performance, it has been adopted by many organisations that seek to build performance through people.

Fill in the form now to download the white paper to find out:

  • What is High Performance Working?
  • What do you need to use it as a strategy?
  • How can you implement High Performance Working in to your own organisation?

These are just some of the questions which the white paper addresses.

Get your copy of this cutting edge white paper that asks the questions that you need to answer in order to implement high performance working in your organisation.

This white paper asks the questions that can help your organisation facilitate improvement before it is too late.  Our latest white paper looks at the issues and how we can help you address them.

First Name *

Last Name *

Position *

Company *

Email *

Phone number *

 Opt in for Ramsey Hall's Monthly Research and Insight
 Ramsey Hall Brochure


Ramsey Hall’s Succession Planning Article – Building the Organisation of the Future

Tuesday, December 6th, 2011

Are you looking at the future of your business? Why not read our article on Succession Planning, published in December issue of Executive Grapevine.

Please click the download button below, or the contact button to request further information.

Download Contact

Please provide your details to download this information

Thank-you for your interest.
Please provide your name, email address and telephone number so we may contact you with any updated information about this and other publications.

Name (required)

Email (required)

Phone number (required)

 Succession Planning Article

Reducing People Costs Through Improved Performance – white paper

Wednesday, September 14th, 2011

With numerous high profile insolvencies having been filed over the last couple of months, now is perhaps a good time to take a look at how your organisation can potentially cut people costs whilst maintaining, or even enhancing, business performance.

To view this white paper, please click here


Talent Management – white paper from Ramsey Hall

Wednesday, September 14th, 2011

At a time of unprecedented economic pressure you may feel that investing money in talent management programmes is too much of a luxury. Well, there is strong evidence to suggest that companies who invest are better placed to succeed, when recovery gathers pace. In this paper, we look at some false assumptions people have when considering their talent management strategy.

Cllick here to view our white paper.



Developing Your Organisation’s Culture To Attract Better Talent

Tuesday, September 13th, 2011

How to develop your culture within your businessHigh performing and effective management teams resolve complex cross-functional issues that are critical to the organisation’s success. By working as a team, and in their collective leadership of the organisation, they need to enact behaviours that define the performance culture it has agreed to create.

Having the right culture for your organisation can:

  • Attract better candidates
  • Gain competitive advantage over your competition
  • Sustain a better environment for your employees
  • Retain vital staff and skills

This article from Ramsey Hall looks at how businesses can develop and sustain a positive culture. Please click here to view.

Matthew Davis is a Chartered FCIPD and Chartered Marketer FCIM qualified HR/Human Capital consulting professional

Matthew Davis is a Chartered FCIPD and Chartered Marketer FCIM qualified HR/Human Capital consulting professional. Experienced in most aspects of resourcing, business psychology, performance management and organisational development consulting as well as team leadership and budgetary management.